Response: Our company is sorry but have not been able to know that it review. When you look at the lines 276-277, i stress a strong selecting based on prior literature: you can find variations in mating positioning considering intimate direction. While doing so, since it starred in the first entry on the description from brand new sociodemographic tool utilized (now, during the p. seven, contours 178-180), i’ve asked about intimate direction and various responses received (heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, other; maybe not «not entirely heterosexual»). We feel one sexual positioning could have been considering the advantages they deserves: the importance has been warranted throughout the addition, the results relating to it was in fact stated in the latest discussion, and contains been recognized about restrictions of your own studies that group heterosexuals/sexual minorities together mode a loss in wealth and you can information about the particular ways homosexuals and you can bisexuals operate.
It means: The very restricted category of younger, training, hetero- or low-heterosexual folks isn’t an easy task to become general beyond by itself therefore never answer the questions about the a lot of time-name orientation variations of your own inhabitants rather than address they within the alone.
Response: Once again, i’ve got issues to fully see the opinion. Employing the various addition/difference requirements is actually better-justified regarding manuscript. All these issue (except this new non-detection of people, which is already told me throughout the area People) was talked about from the restrictions of the investigation, accepting your qualities of your test as well as the newest addition/different criteria make a difference the generalization of your efficiency. I never made an effort to present all of our shot as associate throughout the general population, therefore we don’t know what is the area right here.
Response: We’re disappointed however, i have got trouble to totally understand why review. Therefore, we really do not make improvement in the brand new manuscript regarding that it issue.
Apparently, whoever «signed with the one or more of the three very made use of matchmaking programs from inside the Germany over the last 1 year» (p
Next: The new restricted many years span is pretty a great categorical than simply a metric variable and this overemphasizing prospective aftereffects of decades.
Very, again, the connection status whenever research had been amassed can get or possibly exactly the same on standing inside the early in the day 1 year
Response: Regarding a statistical point of view, we really do not know what this new reviewer is trying to suggest here. Age, up until now, is a variable portrayed in a ratio scale, which have nine different options, out-of 18, 19, 20. in order to twenty-six. What exactly is clear is that the difference between 18 and you may 19 decades is strictly the real difference off 25 to help you 26 many years. This equality regarding point between adjacent results isn’t a home regarding categorical details, so jaumo we cannot concur with the reviewer’s matter.
People in a relationship usually are typical relationship software profiles (Freyth & Batinic, 2021; Hobbs mais aussi al, 2017; Le), relationship Grindr this will be presumed to help you, as more matchmaking are considered become open. Freyth & Batinic further could not discover a distinction of the relationship standing regarding using and never-having fun with relationships apps, and also zero difference between real dating software having fun with conclusion.
Response: Thank you really to suit your review. We are unsure about what the latest customer needs us to customize because of the offered so it opinion.
– Le). Once the Lefebvre indicates the way in which how she analyzed relationships position are maybe not an indicator regarding matchmaking standing when using Tinder: «members recognized its latest relationships status (may/may not mirror their reputation when using Tinder)» (p. 1211).
– Freyth and you will Batinic (2021). It is unsure for people and this time frame these writers used to consider one relationships applications affiliate. 3), although it is not sure whether or not it means only monitored members or to all people.